Muslims
also
call the
Qur'an
the
"Final
Testament",
"The
Book",
"Book
of
God"
and
"The
Revelation."
POST
MUHAMMAD SLAVERY
WHERE
DID MANY OF THE MUSLIM'S SLAVES COME FROM?
Although
Muslims took slaves from all over the lands they conquered, many of the
Muslim slaves were black Africans. There were forced to do the harshest
labor.
There
was a famous black slave revolt in Iraq where thousands of black slaves
revolted and killed tens of thousands of Arabs in Basra. Their slaves were
forced to work in the large Muslim saltpeter mines. During their revolt,
they conquered the city of Basrah, in Iraq. They conquered city after
city, and they couldn't be stopped. Their uprising and drive for freedom
lasted for about 11 years. ["The History of Islam", Robert
Payne, p.185.]
As
the Muslim armies continued to conquer land, they acquired many slaves.
Bernard Lewis in "The Arabs in History" writes:
"polytheists and idolaters were seen primarily as sources of
slaves."
In
the early years of the Arab conquests, vast numbers of slave were acquired
by capture. C.E. Bosworth in "The Islamic Dynasties" writes:
"the use of this labor enabled the Arabs to live on the conquered
land as a rentier class and to exploit some of the economic potential of
the rich Fertile Crescent."
Ibn
Warraq writes: "Arabs were deeply involved in the vast network of
slave trading - they scoured the slave markets of China, India, and
Southeast Asia. There were Turkish slaves from Central Asia, slaves from
the Byzantine Empire, white slave from Central and East Europe, and Black
slaves from West and East Africa. Every city in the Islamic world had its
slave market."
ABUSES
OF SLAVES IN MODERN ISLAM TODAY
Muhammad
did say that slaves should be treated fairly. But they were still a
Muslim's property. Just as abuses occurred under Christianity, so too,
many abuses occurred, and still occur under Islam. The difference between
the two is that Islam ordains the taking of slaves during war, thus
perpetuating slavery. Christianity does not. In slavery's perpetual
existence, Islam has seen great abuses of slaves.
3.
ORDERING OF WOMEN WHO OPPOSED HIM TO BE MURDERED
Anyone,
who reads the biography of Muhammad will notice his reputation . By
treason and violation, he assassinated his opponents. One of the Examples
was when he sent the blind man, umayr b. Abi to Asma bint Marwau and
ordered him to kill her because she had sneered at him. He came to her at
night and entered her house while she was surrounded by her sleeping
children among them a baby whom she was breast feeding . He touched her
with hand, pushed the baby boy aside and plunged his sword into her chest
until it penetrated her back. Then he returned and went to Muhammad in the
mosque, and performed the Morning Prayer with Muhammad and give him
details how he killed her. He praised him profusely. Then Muhammad turned
toward the people and said anyone who like to see a man who is the service
of God and his Prophet see Umayr B.Abi (Sira Halabiyya, chapter on Umayr
b. Abi mission to kill Asma).
4.
ORDERING THE MURDER OF SLAVE GIRLS WHOM HAD MOCKED HIM
Muhammad
ordered that a man who apostatized, and his two slave girls, be killed.
Khatal was ordered to be killing not because he killed his male slave, a
Muslim, but because he apostatized. Islamic law does not allow a Muslim
man to be put to death for killing a slave. Muhammad also ordered two
slave girls to be killed for singing satirical songs about him. Remember
that they sung these songs about Muhammad years earlier. Now it was
Muhammad's payback time. Look, these slave girls were not threats to
Islam, or to the new Islamic State. They were only slave girls. They were
order to be executed only because they sang a silly song about Muhammad.
As
for Ibn Khatal's two singing girls, one was killed and the other ran away
until the apostle, asked for immunity, gave it to her."
So,
one girl was murdered, one ran away. When Muhammad eased up, she pleads
for forgiveness, and he gave her immunity.
So,
one of the slave girls escapes, the other is executed. Later, the living
slave girl begs forgiveness, and is forgiven. Again, this shows that
Muhammad's death sentences were willy-nilly. They mocked him, they paid
(one with her life). Later, as Muhammad felt more secure, he forgave the
remaining slave girl.
ANALYSIS
The
Hadith I
quoted
show
that:
1)
The
Muslim
men were
out in
the
field,
and took
female
captives
following
a
battle.
2)
They
were
divided
up
between
the men
and the
men were
very
horny.
They
were
without
their
wives
who were
back
home.
3)
So, the
men
prepared
to have
sex with
the
females,
out on
the
field,
away
from
home,
and
asked
Muhammad
about
coitus
interruptus.
They
didn't
want to
get the
females
pregnant
because
they
wanted
to later
sell the
female
slaves
for
money.
Had they
gotten
them
pregnant
the
Muslim
men
would be
forced
to be
responsible
for the
children.
4)
Marriage
wasn't
required
to have
sex with
the
females.
Listen
to the
men's
own
words....
"we
were
interested
in their
prices",
i.e.,
they
wanted
to sell
them. No
Muslim
man
would
marry a
women
intending
to sell
her
later.
That is
not what
"nikah"
-
marriage
was all
about.
These
men
wanted
to have
sex with
their
slaves,
enjoy
them,
and they
later
sell
them.
5)
And if
you note
what Ali
did, -
had sex
with a
female
before
the
"human
booty"
was
divided
up
between
the
Muslim
soldiers.
Muhammad
allowed
him to
do this.
What
does all
of this
boil
down to?
Muslim
men were
allowed
to have
intercourse
with
their
female
slaves
after
the
slaves
had had
one
menstrual
period.
The
reason
for
waiting
one
menstrual
cycle
was to
insure
that the
female
slaves
were not
already
pregnant
prior to
being
captured.
In
some
cases,
the
female
slave's
husbands
were
also
captives
and it
was
still
legal
for the
Muslim
men to
have sex
with the
female
captives.
Muhammad
received
a
"revelation"
allowing
the
Muslim
men to
have sex
with the
female
slaves
while
there
were
still
married
to their
captive
husbands.
A note
on the
Hadith
says
that
according
to
Islam,
when the
married
couple
is
captured,
their
marriage
is
automatically
annulled!
Muslims
did not
need to
marry
the
female
slave or
give her
any type
of dowry
in order
to have
sex with
her.
Muslims
did not
need to
have the
female
slave's
permission
to have
intercourse
with
her. She
was his
property,
(as was
noted by
Tabari),
and
thus, as
property,
the
Muslim
owner
had an
Allah-given
right to
have
intercourse
with her
if he
desired.
I have
yet to
find one
Quranic
verse or
Hadith
that
says
that the
female's
slave's
permission
was
required.
All
Hadith
and
Quranic
verses
that
pertain
to
Muslim
men
having
intercourse
with
female
slaves
always
put the
option
on the
slave-owning
man,
whether
he wants
it or
not. The
slaves
were not
given a
choice.
THE
MUSLIM
MEN WERE
RAPING
THEIR
FEMALE
SLAVES
AND
MUHAMMAD
ALLOWED
IT!
Think
about it
from the
women's
point of
view. A
battle
is
fought
and her
side
lost.
Many of
the
husbands,
fathers,
and sons
are now
dead.
Some
have
been
captured.
The
women
and
children
are also
taken as
captives.
Imagine
the
horror
of the
females.
Family
members
dead,
homes
and
possessions
are now
gone,
they are
in the
total
power of
their
captors.
The
captives
are
distributed
amongst
the
Muslim
men as
slaves,
husband
and wife
captives
are
separated.
As soon
as a
female
has her
menstrual
cycle
her
owner
appears.
He has
been
separated
from his
wife for
a while
out on
the
field of
battle,
sexually
hungry,
and he
proceeds
to have
sex with
his
female
slave.
Do
you
think
that
this
female
slave
willingly
has
intercourse
with
him? Is
that her
wish?
She has
just
experienced
one of
the most
horrible
events
in her
life, -
the
destruction
of her
tribe
and
family,
the
taking
of her
possessions,
and
being
made
someone's
slave,
and now
she
willing
consents
to have
sex with
the very
men who
brought
this
disaster
upon
her!? Of
course
not!
What
women
would
look
upon
with
loving
eyes the
men that
brought
destruction
upon her
family
and
tribe!
Would
Jesus
Christ
allow
soldiers
to rape
female
slaves?
What
would
the
world
say if
Israel
allowed
its
soldiers
to take
Palestinian
females
prisoner
and rape
with
them?
There
would be
a
horrible
outcry!
Examine
the
events
in
Kosovo
and
Bosnia.
Here the
same
situation
occurred.
The
Muslims
were
defeated
by the
Serbs
and some
Serbs
raped
Muslims.
It is a
horrible
crime
and we
all
condemn
it. But
if we
examine
what
Muhammad
allowed
his
soldiers
to do we
see that
their
actions
are
identical.
Muhammad's
standards
were
little
better
than
Serbs
who
raped
Muslim
women.
The
Japanese
did this
to the
Chinese,
Korean
and
Filipino
women
during
WWII.
The
Germans
did
likewise
to the
Russian
women.
In a
similar
way the
Muslim
soldiers
only
waited a
few
weeks to
do
likewise
to their
female
captives.
Muhammad
and his
soldiers
treated
these
female
slaves
just
like the
Japanese
did to
their
female
captives.
Much has
been
written
condemning
the
treatment
of black
slaves
in the
West:
how much
more
should a
man who
claimed
to be a
prophet
of God
be
condemned
for
these
acts?
Some
attention
needs to
be paid
to the
Quranic
term
used
here for
slave. I'm
told
that the
Quranic
classical
Arabic
reads
'ma
malakat
aymanukum'.
Let's
examine
a fuller
definition
of this
term.
Starting
with the
Encyclopedia
of
Islam,
Published
by E.J.
Brill,
Vol. 1,
page 24
under
the word
'abd',
it says:
"Abd
is the
ordinary
word for
'slave'
in
Arabic
of all
periods,
more
particularly
for
"male
slave",
"female
slave"
being
ama. On
the
other
hand,
the
Quran
frequently
uses the
term
"rakaba",
literally
"neck,
nape of
the
neck",
and
still
more
frequently,
the
periphrasis
"ma
malakat
aymanukum
-
"that
which
your
(their)
right
hand
possesses".
So,
the
Quran
uses the
phrase
"that
which
your
right
hand
possesses"
as a
term for
slave.
Moving
to the
Shorter
Encyclopedia
of
Islam,
we find
similar.
Under
"mamluk"
it says:
"The
term (mamluk)
owes its
origin
probably
to the
current
phrase
of the
Quran ma
malakat
aimanukum
-
"what
your
right
hand
possesses",
a
general
designation
of
slaves
without
specialization
of
gender."
Referencing
Hughes
Dictionary
of
Islam,
page 596
on
slavery,
it says:
"The
term
generally
used in
the
Quran
for
slaves
is
"ma
malakat
aimanukum",
-
"that
which
your
right
hand
possesses."
BIBLIOGRAPHY
[1]
"Sahih
Bukhari",
translated
into
English
by Dr.
Muhammad
Muhsin
Khan, at
the
Islamic
University
in
Medina,
published
by Kitab
Bhavan,
New
Delhi,
India.
[2]
"Muhammad
and the
Religion
of Islam",
by John
Gilchrist,
page
273,
published
by Jesus
to the
Muslims,
Durban,
South
Africa.
It can
be found
on the
web at:
[3]
"The
Koran",
by N. J.
Dawood,
published
by
Penguin,
London
England
[4]
"The
Meaning
of the
Glorious
Koran",
by M.
Pickthall.
published
by
Mentor,
NY, NY.
[5]
"The
Koran",
by A. J.
Arberry,
published
by
Oxford
University
Press,
Oxford,
England.
[6]
"The
Koran",
by J. M.
Rodwell,
published
by
Everyman,
London,
England.
[7]
"The
Holy
Quran",
by Yusef
Ali,
published
by
Amana,
Beltsville,
Maryland.
[8]
The
Hughes
Encyclopedia
Dictionary
of Islam"
[9]
"Ency.
of
Islam",
pub. by
Brill,
Netherlands.
[10]
"Sahih
Muslim",
translated
by A.
Siddiqi,
published
by
International
Islamic
Publishing
House,
Riyadh,
and KSA.
Muhammed
-The
Sins of
Muhammad
- Islamic
Doctrine
- Part 1
Muhammad
- Sins
of
Muhammad
-
Study
of Islam
&
Quran
Part 2
Quran
-
Verses
from
Quran,
Hadith
Allah,
Dhanb or
Sins
Muhammad
- Islam
Prophet
Muhammad
Study
of Quran
Sins of
Muhammad
Muhammad
- Prophet
Muhammad
Praise
of Idols
Muhammad
- Prophet
Muhammad
Ancestry
of
Muhammad
Muhammad
- Prophet
Muhammad
Study of
Quran -
Slaves
murdered
Muhammad
- Prophet
Muhammad
Study of
Quran -
Part 4
Links
to Muhammad, the Quran & Islam